Justice or Vengeance? by Nik Green.

 

We all share in the horror and revulsion caused by a murderers' actions.

There is no doubt that the killing of a fellow human mandates the

killer's removal from society.

 

America has always been a violent society, reflected in its continued

love affair with guns and weapons and the making of war. We are paying

dearly for this legacy. Many people, specially males are still raised to

accept the modus operandum of violence and as a result the value of

human life is diminished, cheapened, easily dispensible. Many

traditional values, specially in the South also reflect inbred hatreds

and intolerances, and the 'death penalty' is supported by mostly

conservative lawmakers who prioritize knee-jerk vengeance over justice.

It is unheard of for a wealthy white defendant in a capital case to

receive a death sentence, let alone be executed. Death sentences are

reserved for people of color, or working class whites. Nobody knows how

many innocent people have gone to their deaths beacuse they could not

afford the likes of Johnny Cochrane, but the fact remains that innocent

people have been, will be, and are killed by the state.

 

America has one of the worlds highest murder rates per capita, supassing

that of many so-called 'less developed' nations, yet we also have one of

the worlds highest execution rates. Capital punishment has been proved

no deterrent: countries that have abolished the 'death penalty' find

that the murder rate either decreases of stays largely unchanged.

I know what it is like to have someone near to you taken out by a

deranged person. Two people close to me, one a close professional

colleague, and the other a very good friend were murdered. If those two

killers had been executed, would I be satisfied? Would I feel that

'justice' was served? Would I know for sure that the actual killers had

been executed? Would it bring back my two dead friends? The answer to

all of these is an absolute no, although I am aware that there are many

people who do prefer the course of revenge to that of healing.

No matter how 'reformed' or jovial Boggess appeared in facing execution,

the fact remains that human life has been cheapened, degraded just a bit

more, by yet another state-sanctioned premeditated and cold blooded

murder. Life sentence without parole is the only acceptable solution in

a society with any pretence at civilized behavior.

 

There is a courtroom in Texas where the judge has a plaque

(unconstitutionally) displaying the Ten Commandments. One of these says,

very plainly, that "Thou shalt not kill". It should apply to all of

us...and that includes the State. Violence begets violence, and if the

state can do it without redress, then its seen as more or less

acceptable. In this double standard of killing we have systematically

trashed our moral and judicial credibility, joining the likes the likes

of totalitarian nations such as Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

Finally, lest anyone think that I'm being 'soft' on murderers, I put the

case that life in prison without parole surrounded by the dregs of

society is probably subjectively as severe a punishment as being

sentenced to death, where the perpetrator has to live with his actions

until the time that natural causes dictate that his time on Earth

finishes, as opposed to those arbitrary macho whims of a revenge-filled

judge who wants to play at being God.


this essage prompted by a PBS special on the Death Penalty.